Model Number 97714 |
Device Problem
Overheating of Device (1437)
|
Patient Problems
Burn(s) (1757); Skin Inflammation (2443)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The main component of the system and other applicable components are: product id: 37791, serial# unknown, product type: recharger.Product id: 97754, serial# (b)(4), product type: recharger.
|
|
Event Description
|
The consumer reported via the manufacturer representative that they had heating during charging.The device was reprogrammed and recharging was reviewed.The representative reported that the recharging antenna was getting hot while charging.The antenna was damaged.A replacement was sent.This indication for use was non-malignant pain.The consumer reported that the recharger burnt them and caused blistering of the skin on their chest.There was a report that the patient was told that the temperature sensor inside the recharger antenna and that must have failed.It was reported that the recharger burnt the patient.They were given a replacement recharger.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from a consumer indicating that they require a manufacturer representative to inquire about a reimbursement.The caller reinstates that their implantable neurostimulator recharger (insr) antenna is too hot and burning him and that the patient programmer (pp) was junk.The caller is wondering why a follow-up letter is being sent after their device was explanted.The caller requested a status update on their analysis report and was informed the analysis report will be sent to their healthcare professional.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (nmd721194h) found that there were no anomalies.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from the patient.It was reported that the patient had not heard back regarding the analysis of the device.The patient stated they would prefer to work it out with the manufacturer and not have to get a lawyer.The patient stated the charger messed up, referring to the issues already reported.The patient wanted to be reimbursed.A request to patient relations was sent.It was reported the analysis letter was mailed out on march 30, 2017 to the patient¿s doctor.A message was left with the patient.No further complications were reported/expected.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|