• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO SYNERGY; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO SYNERGY; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 7427
Device Problems Intermittent Continuity (1121); Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect (1209); High impedance (1291); Unintended Collision (1429); Pocket Stimulation (1463); Unable to Obtain Readings (1516); Low impedance (2285)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
Event Date 01/01/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was reported from a manufacturing representative regarding a patient.It was reported that the patient felt a surge about 2 months ago.The patient turned their implantable neurostimulator (ins) off, and has left it off until the day of the report.Impedance measurements were taken on the day of the report, and contacts 0-4 and 4-7 were above 4000 ohms.All other impedances were between 500-2000 ohms.The patient does not experience symptoms when the ins is off.It was noted that the patient did fall on (b)(6) 2016.The manufacturing representative programmed the patient around contact 4 and turned their stimulation back on, on the day of the report.It was noted that the patient stated they felt stimulation in the wrong location.It was reviewed that the patient¿s lead may have migrated from the fall.The patient was to follow up with their healthcare provider.The patient was implanted for radicular pain syndrome (radiculopathies).
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the manufacturing representative indicated that the patient was reprogrammed and receiving sufficient coverage for pain relief.No other action has been taken thus far about a possible battery and lead replacement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) no longer applies.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
On 2016-12-22 a manufacturer representative called in regarding this event and requested information about the model number of the patient¿s lead.Additional information was received on 2017-01-05 from a manufacturer representative reporting that impedance measurements were taken on (b)(6) 2017 with the following results when run at 3v and 210us: 0/1 had ???, 0/2 had 931, 0/3 had 931, 0/4 had281, 0/5 had 931, 0/6 had 931; 1 /2 had 693, 0/3 had 931, 0/4 had 2815, 0/5 had 931, 0/6 had 931, 0/7 had 931; 2/3 had 693, 2/ 4 had 2815, 2/5 had 931, 2/6 had 931, 2/7 had 931, 3/4 had 2815, 3/5 had 931, 3/6 had 931, 3/7 had 2, 4/6 had 2815, 5/6 had 953, and 6/7 had 693.When measurements were taken at 3v with 90 us there were a lot of ??? values.When measurements were taken with 3v and 300us, the following values were seen: 0/4 had >4000, ¼ had >4000, 0/7 had ????, 3/ 4 had ???, 4/5 had >2000, 4/6 had >2000, and 4/7 had ???.The patient was programmed with 2 programs.Program1 used 0- and 1+ while program 2 used electrodes 5, 6, and 7.The patient claimed to be getting good coverage until the last few months.Stimulation was increasing or decreasing around the pocket area.The manufacturer representative was made aware of these issues on the day of the call (b)(6) 2017.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNERGY
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key6178674
MDR Text Key62540421
Report Number3004209178-2016-26567
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/06/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/14/2005
Device Model Number7427
Device Catalogue Number7427
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/14/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/15/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
01/06/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/19/2016
01/06/2017
01/06/2017
09/28/2017
Date Device Manufactured03/23/2004
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
-
-