Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-JUG-CELECT-PT |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204); Stacking Breaths (1593); Chest Pain (1776); No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 02/10/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog#: unknown but referred to as a cook celect filter.Since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either k061815, k073374, k090140, k112119, k121057 or k121629.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2015." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog#: igtcfs-65-1-jug-celect-pt.According to device history records, based on the lot number provided, there is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications or that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G., the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava in the situations described in the ifu.It has not been possible to fully investigate or evaluate this event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2015." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 11/22/2016 as follows: plaintiff allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2015 via the right internal jugular vein due to dvt.Plaintiff alleges attempted retrieval on (b)(6) 2015.Plaintiff is alleging device is unable to be retrieved, embedded, chest pain, shortness of breath, dizzy, headache.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer reference #: (b)(4).Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).Corrected data based on new information received: adverse event to product problem, serious injury to malfunction.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "device is unable to be retrieved, embedded, chest pain, shortness of breath, dizzy, headache¿.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Unknown if the reported chest pain, shortness of breath, dizziness, and headache are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|