Model Number H7493926016350 |
Device Problems
Bent (1059); Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 11/22/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device is a combination product.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that balloon removal difficulty, shaft break, stent damage and stent explantation occurred.The target lesion was located in the proximal left anterior descending artery (lad).After a 3.50x 6 synergy ii everolimus-eluting platinum chromium coronary stent system was deployed, removal of the stent delivery system (sds) was attempted.However, the sds balloon became stuck on the stent and would not come back.A great force was applied to remove the device, but the shaft was separated and broke in half.The physician was able to grab the shaft with a lot of force and removed the device from the patient, but the stent was explanted and still on the balloon and deformed.The procedure was completed using a new guide, a non-bsc guide extension catheter and a 3.5x22mm non-bsc stent.No patient complications were reported and the patient¿s status was fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: synergy ii, us, mr, 3.5 x 16mm stent delivery system (sds) was returned.A visual examination found the stent to be severely damaged.Struts overlapping and bunched towards the distal end of the balloon.The balloon showed signs that positive pressure was applied.Crimp pillowing/markings were not evident on the entire length of the balloon - highly pronounced crimp pillowing/markings would suggest that the balloon did not receive any significant positive pressure.A visual and tactile examination found several hypotube kinks along full length of catheter.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the delivery system.A visual and tactile examination found a break in the polymer extrusion proximal of the port exchange site.The port bond also showed sign of a neck down.The bi-component bond showed no signs of damage or strain.A visual examination found no tip damage.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that balloon removal difficulty, shaft break, stent damage and stent explantation occurred.The target lesion was located in the proximal left anterior descending artery (lad).After a 3.50x 6 synergy ii everolimus-eluting platinum chromium coronary stent system was deployed, removal of the stent delivery system (sds) was attempted.However, the sds balloon became stuck on the stent and would not come back.A great force was applied to remove the device, but the shaft was separated and broke in half.The physician was able to grab the shaft with a lot of force and removed the device from the patient, but the stent was explanted and still on the balloon and deformed.The procedure was completed using a new guide, a non-bsc guide extension catheter and a 3.5x22mm non-bsc stent.No patient complications were reported and the patient¿s status was fine.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|