No medical records and no medical images were provided to the manufacturer.The lot number for the device was provided.The device history records are currently under review.The return of the device is pending.The investigation is currently under way.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records were reviewed with special attention to the (b)(4) materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only event reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.Visual inspection: the sample was returned with the product label and packaging.The storage tube and y-body were not returned for evaluation.No anomalies were noted to the returned dilator.A slight kink was noted 54.3 cm from the distal tip of the sheath.The pusher catheter was noted to be kinked 29.2 m from the proximal end of the handle.The kinks will be noted as incidental findings as it is unknown when they occurred as they were not reported by the facility.The filter was returned fully deployed.All 6 arms and 6 legs were present and intact.All of the limbs were fully expanded.Dimensional evaluation: heat was applied to the filter and the filter took the appropriate shape.All measurements met the required specification.Medical records review: medical records were not provided for review.Image/photo review: images/photos were not provided for review.Conclusion: the device was returned.Images were not provided.Medical records were not provided.The complaint investigation was inconclusive for the reported event as crossed limbs were not observed on the returned filter.Per the reported event, the physician pulled back on the pusher prior to deployment.Per the instructions for use (ifu), "retraction and twisting of the pusher during delivery could result in dislodgement of the filter, crossing of filter legs or arms, and could prevent the filter from further advancement within the introducer sheath." therefore, it is possible that the physician's deployment technique contributed to the reported event.Per the reported event, there was clot burden in the area deployed.Therefore, it is possible that patient factors (clot) prevented the filter from completely expanding within the ivc.Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warning: delivery of the denali filter through the introducer sheath is advance only.Retraction and twisting of the pusher during delivery could result in dislodgement of the filter, crossing of filter legs or arms, and could prevent the filter from further advancement within the introducer sheath.Precautions: do not deliver the filter by pushing it beyond the end of the introducer sheath.To achieve proper placement, unsheath the stationary filter by withdrawing the introducer sheath.Do not twist the pusher at anytime during this procedure.Potential complications: failure of filter expansion/incomplete expansion.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|