• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. DENALI JUGULAR SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. DENALI JUGULAR SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number DL950J
Device Problem Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/23/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
No medical records and no medical images were provided to the manufacturer.The lot number for the device was provided.The device history records are currently under review.The return of the device is pending.The investigation is currently under way.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a jugular deployment of a vena cava filter, the filter legs were allegedly twisted.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the device history records were reviewed with special attention to the (b)(4) materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only event reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.Visual inspection: the sample was returned with the product label and packaging.The storage tube and y-body were not returned for evaluation.No anomalies were noted to the returned dilator.A slight kink was noted 54.3 cm from the distal tip of the sheath.The pusher catheter was noted to be kinked 29.2 m from the proximal end of the handle.The kinks will be noted as incidental findings as it is unknown when they occurred as they were not reported by the facility.The filter was returned fully deployed.All 6 arms and 6 legs were present and intact.All of the limbs were fully expanded.Dimensional evaluation: heat was applied to the filter and the filter took the appropriate shape.All measurements met the required specification.Medical records review: medical records were not provided for review.Image/photo review: images/photos were not provided for review.Conclusion: the device was returned.Images were not provided.Medical records were not provided.The complaint investigation was inconclusive for the reported event as crossed limbs were not observed on the returned filter.Per the reported event, the physician pulled back on the pusher prior to deployment.Per the instructions for use (ifu), "retraction and twisting of the pusher during delivery could result in dislodgement of the filter, crossing of filter legs or arms, and could prevent the filter from further advancement within the introducer sheath." therefore, it is possible that the physician's deployment technique contributed to the reported event.Per the reported event, there was clot burden in the area deployed.Therefore, it is possible that patient factors (clot) prevented the filter from completely expanding within the ivc.Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warning: delivery of the denali filter through the introducer sheath is advance only.Retraction and twisting of the pusher during delivery could result in dislodgement of the filter, crossing of filter legs or arms, and could prevent the filter from further advancement within the introducer sheath.Precautions: do not deliver the filter by pushing it beyond the end of the introducer sheath.To achieve proper placement, unsheath the stationary filter by withdrawing the introducer sheath.Do not twist the pusher at anytime during this procedure.Potential complications: failure of filter expansion/incomplete expansion.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a jugular deployment of a vena cava filter, the filter legs were allegedly twisted.Reportedly, the health care provider captured and retrieved the filter and successfully deployed another.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DENALI JUGULAR SYSTEM
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key6187760
MDR Text Key62794624
Report Number2020394-2016-01180
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/24/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2019
Device Catalogue NumberDL950J
Device Lot NumberGFAS2083
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/13/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/24/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/19/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/14/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/14/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age66 YR
-
-