(b)(4).On (b)(6) 2016, asahi intecc obtained information regarding the device issue.Several attempts were made to obtain complete event information; however, no additional information other than pericardial effusion was obtained.On (b)(6) 2016, asahi intecc became aware of this pericardial effusion; therefore, date of awareness is considered to be (b)(6) 2016.Since there was no information regarding how pericardial effusion was occurred and how it was treated, it was possible that perforation of a vessel could have occurred.If so, it could not be denied that the asahi catheter might have contributed perforation.The non-asahi wire was inserted into the asahi catheter when the devices were returned for manufacturer investigation.An attempt was made to remove the wire from the catheter but the devices could not be separated.In the observation of the returned asahi catheter, wavy deformation which can be typically seen on a used catheter was found on the distal shaft.The tip surface was rugged and there were scratch marks which can be typically seen after use.Near the proximal end of the asahi catheter, there observed unraveled strands of the shaft suggesting excessive rotational force was accumulated on that spot.The distal tip was observed under x-ray.It revealed the non-asahi wire formed several knots of the coils inside the asahi catheter.Locations of coil knots were found to be overlapped with rugged surface of the catheter tip.These findings suggested that suck between the devices was caused due to deformation of the non-asahi wire.Stretching of the asahi catheter was observed during procedure; however, no elongation was observed on the returned asahi catheter.Lot history review revealed no anomaly relating to the reported event and no other similar product experience report was received.Based on the information provided and the investigation outcome, stuck occurred between the asahi catheter and the non-asahi wire was due to deformation of the non-asahi wire.It is presumed that one-directional rotational force exceeding the product design limit might have contributed to deformation of the coils of the non-asahi wire as well as unraveling of the strands of the asahi catheter.Therefore, excessive rotational force applied during device manipulation was thought to be causation of possible perforation.Damages caused by excessive rotational force were seen on both devices and it could not be identified whether which device triggered possible perforation.Ifu states that: do not rotate this microcatheter in the same direction, either clockwise or counterclockwise, for more than 10 consecutive rotations.If resistance is felt while rotating this microcatheter, do not proceed with further rotation regardless of the number of performed rotations.Identify the cause of resistance under fluoroscopy, and take an appropriate action.Never continue the operation without identifying the cause.(continuing rotation may damage or break apart this microcatheter or damage the blood vessels.).
|
Reportedly, a non-asahi wire crossed a lesion in the proximal under a support of a non-asahi support catheter.An asahi catheter was advanced over the non-asahi wire for passing the lesion and facilitating wire exchange from the wire to a softer wire.The asahi catheter could not fully advance on the wire and the devices got stuck together.When the operators tried to remove the catheter and leave the wire in place, it caused stretching of the catheter, and whole system was removed.The patient experienced pericardial effusion and discharged after some treatment.
|