• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-JUG-TULIP
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Anxiety (2328); No Information (3190)
Event Date 05/13/2011
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Catalog #: unknown but referred to as a cook günther tulip filter.Expiration date: unknown as lot # is unknown.Mfr date unknown as lot # is unknown.Investigation is still in progress.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2010." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Catalog #: unknown but referred to as a cook günther tulip filter.Expiration date: unknown as lot# is unknown.Mfr date unknown as lot # is unknown.It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2010." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).According to device history records, based on the lot number provided, there is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications or that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G., the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava in the situations described in the ifu.It has not been possible to fully investigate or evaluate this event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2010".Patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
 
Event Description
This additional information was received on 12/05/2016 as follows: the plaintiff allegedly received the device implant via right interior jugular vein on (b)(6) 2010 due to trauma.An unsuccessful retrieval attempt allegedly occurred on (b)(6) 2011.The plaintiff alleges device is unable to be retrieved and anxiety.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Corrected data based on new information received: adverse event to product problem, serious injury to malfunction.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "an unsuccessful retrieval attempt allegedly occurred on (b)(6) 201, the plaintiff alleges device is unable to be retrieved and anxiety¿.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA  4632
Manufacturer Contact
thomas hessner kirk
400 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8004574500
MDR Report Key6192244
MDR Text Key62908950
Report Number3002808486-2016-01510
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090140
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/27/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-1-JUG-TULIP
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/08/2016
Device Age19 MO
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/08/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/21/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/01/2017
03/01/2017
05/09/2017
06/27/2017
Date Device Manufactured10/15/2009
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age26 YR
Patient Weight62
-
-