• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT NAVALIGN JUGULAR & FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT NAVALIGN JUGULAR & FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-UNI-CELECT
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Structural Problem (2506); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Perforation of Vessels (2135); Stenosis (2263); No Information (3190); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 03/31/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Lot#: unknown as information was not provided.Catalog#: unknown but referred to as a cook celect filter.Expiration date: unknown as lot# is unknown.Since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either k061815, k073374, k090140, k112119, k121057 or k121629.Mfr date: unknown as lot# is unknown.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2013." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Catalog number: unknown but referred to as a cook celect filter.Since catalog number is unknown the 510(k) could be either k061815, k073374, k090140, k112119, k121057 or k121629.(b)(4).It has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2013." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer reference # (b)(4).Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).Name and address for importer site: cook medical incorporated (cmi) (b)(4).Corrected data based on new information received: adverse event to product problem, serious injury to malfunction.The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
 
Event Description
This additional information received on 03/09/2017 as follows: patient received an implant on (b)(6) 2013 due to deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Patient is alleging anxiety and that the device is unable to be retrieved.Retrieval was attempted on (b)(6) 2014.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer reference # (b)(4).Exemption number e2016032.(b)(4).It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating 'celect, occluded ivc (embolus trapped in filter), unable to retrieve, anxiety, stress'.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Filter retrieval is occasionally difficult.This is well-known from published scientific literature where filter retrievals are referred to as simple vs.Complex.Several case reports published in scientific literature describe complex cases with successful endovascular filter retrievals using additional, advanced techniques.Ivc thrombotic occlusion as an outcome for cook ivc filters is addressed in the published scientific literature.Ivc thrombotic occlusion is defined as the presence of an occluding thrombus in the ivc after filter insertion and documented by ultrasound (us), ct, mr imaging or venography; this may be symptomatic or asymptomatic.Unknown if the reported anxiety, stress is directly related to the filter and unable to identify corresponding failure mode(s) at this time.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
 
Event Description
Patient is alleging vena cava perforation.Patient further alleges "anxiety over the filter and the possibility of it moving and damaging any organs and leading to serious injuries.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The following allegations have been investigated: vena cava (vc) perforation.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.(b)(4) in lot.To date, no other complaints have been reported against the lot.The associated work order was reviewed.No related/relevant notes were documented.The device is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Per computed tomography report, "there is a celect type ivc filter in place in the inferior vena cava which consists of 4 larger centering struts and approximately 8 smaller anchorage struts.The filter is nearly vertically oriented and parallel to the long axis of the ivc.The upper tip of the filter is located 2 cm below the confluence of the renal veins and ivc.The ivc is narrow at the level of the filter, measuring approximately 1.4 cm transverse by 0.9 cm ap.The distal ivc is also narrow measuring 1.3 x 0.8 cm.Above the filter, it dilates to 2.8 x 1.4 cm.Note is made of a prominent right ovarian vein draining into the ivc above the filter.In the central aspect of the filter, there is a short linear density best seen on series 2, image 36 which measures 4 mm in length by 1 mm diameter.This is of uncertain origin.All 8 of the anchorage struts are otherwise intact.The larger centering struts project outside of the ivc wall, most prominent anteriorly on the left at the 1 o'clock position.This extends into the transverse portion of the duodenum by up to 0.8 cm in length.No extension into the aorta or spine is identified." "impression: 1.Celect type ivc filter in place in the inferior vena cava.A left anterior strut likely extends into the transverse portion of the duodenum.A central linear density is nonspecific and could represent small broken fragment or calcification.2.Note is made of relative stenosis of the ivc at the level of the filter.There is a dilated right ovarian vein.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The following allegations have been investigated: fracture, organ perforation, stenosis.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter fracture has been reported and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Fracture of a filter leg may be due to repetitive motion on a filter leg in an unusual, stressed position, such as a filter leg penetrating/perforating the ivc; or a filter leg being caught in a side branch (e.G., a renal vein).Other potential causes of filter fracture may include excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Retrieval of a fractured filter or filter fragments (including embolized fragments) using endovascular techniques has been reported.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: filter fracture, filter or filter fragment embolization, trauma to adjacent structures.The additional information regarding organ perforation does not change the previous investigation results for vena cava perforation.Ivc occlusion/ thrombosis, new dvt, ivc stenosis as a reported complication, is a known risk in relation to filter implant and is well documented in the clinical literature and in clinical practice guidelines.This is supported by the clinical evidence report established to assess available clinical data to identify and evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the cook vena cava filters.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, vena cava stenosis, deep vein thrombosis.(b)(4) devices in lot.No relevant notes on wo for neither device ((b)(6)) lot# e3122364, nor celect filter lots# e3118879 and e3120927.No other complaints on lot.Product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COOK CELECT NAVALIGN JUGULAR & FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA  4632
Manufacturer (Section G)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov
Manufacturer Contact
lissi walmann
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov, IN 47404
8004574500
MDR Report Key6192252
MDR Text Key62908658
Report Number3002808486-2016-01501
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090140
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/21/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-1-UNI-CELECT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/06/2016
Device Age7 MO
Date Manufacturer Received11/08/2022
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight82 KG
-
-