Catalog Number 1012449-12 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/01/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion located in the mid left anterior descending (lad) artery with heavy tortuosity and mild calcification.Resistance was felt during advancement of the 3.0 mm x 12 mm nc trek rx balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) to the lesion and the hypotube of the bdc separated prior to crossing the lesion.A replacement bdc was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects or clinically significant delay the procedure reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).It was initially reported that the device would be returned for analysis; however the device was not returned.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).It was reported that the device was not returned for analysis; however, the device was returned.Evaluation summary: visual and dimensional inspections were performed on the returned device.The proximal shaft separation was confirmed.The failure to advance could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.The investigation determined the reported failure to advance and proximal shaft separation appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure since the device interacted with the difficult anatomy.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|