Model Number H7493911324400 |
Device Problem
Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 12/07/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that stent explantation occurred.The 80% stenosed target lesion was located in the mid right coronary artery (rca).A guidezilla¿ guide extension catheter was advanced however, resistance was encountered.An "unspectical" balloon catheter was used to resolve the issue and a non-bsc stent was implanted.However, the non-bsc stent was noted to be damaged by the guidezilla¿.The implanted non-bsc stent was removed and was exchanged with a 4.00 x24mm promus element ¿ stent.Following implantation of the 4.00 x24mm promus element ¿ stent, the stent was noted to be extruded by the guidezilla¿.The promus element ¿ stent and the guidezilla¿ were then removed and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.No further patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: the stent delivery system (sds) was returned for analysis.A visual examination of the stent appeared to be partially deployed as some stent struts were no longer in crimp state on the balloon, stent struts were damaged and pushed towards the distal end of balloon body; some stent struts over the distal markerband.Stent damage most likely occurred when the stent got in contact with the guidezilla.The distal edge of the bumper tip of the device showed signs of very slight damage.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the delivery system.The balloon body was reviewed and no issues were noted with the overall balloon.Crimp markings were evident on the exposed balloon body and balloon wings appeared relaxed.A visual and tactile examination found no kinks along the hypotube shaft.A visual and tactile examination of the outer and mid-shaft section found a kink in the inner extrusion within 0.5 -1cm proximal of the proximal bond.The bi-component bond showed no signs of damage or strain.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the delivery system.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable cause of the reported difficulties may be due interaction with another device.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that stent explantation occurred.The 80% stenosed target lesion was located in the mid right coronary artery (rca).A guidezilla¿ guide extension catheter was advanced however, resistance was encountered.An "unspectical" balloon catheter was used to resolve the issue and a non-bsc stent was implanted.However, the non-bsc stent was noted to be damaged by the guidezilla¿.The implanted non-bsc stent was removed and was exchanged with a 4.00 x24mm promus element ¿ stent.Following implantation of the 4.00 x24mm promus element ¿ stent, the stent was noted to be extruded by the guidezilla¿.The promus element ¿ stent and the guidezilla¿ were then removed and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.No further patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|