• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY PROMUS ELEMENT ¿; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY PROMUS ELEMENT ¿; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number H7493911316270
Device Problem Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/22/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr.: the manifold/hub of the stent delivery system (sds) was not returned for analysis therefore it was not possible to identify the catheter batch/serial number.A visual examination of the stent found that stent struts from rows 2 to 16 from the proximal end of stent were deformed, bent and twisted.Stent damage most likely occurred during withdrawal attempts.The bumper tip of the device showed no signs of damage.The balloon body was reviewed and no issues were noted with the overall balloon; however the balloon appeared bent at the location where stent damage was noted, from stent struts rows 2 to 16 from the proximal end of stent.The balloon wings were tightly wrapped and evenly folded and were not subjected to positive pressure.The type of damage noted most likely occurred due to stent damage.A visual and tactile examination found that hypotube was broken 1444mm from edge of the tip with multiple kinks along the full catheter length.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the delivery system.A visual and tactile examination of the outer and mid-shaft section found no issues on the extrusion.The bi-component bond showed no signs of damage or strain.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 07-dec-2016.It was reported that crossing difficulties were encountered.   the target lesion was located in the distal left anterior descending artery.After cannulating the left side using a 6f non-bsc introducer sheath, a 0.014 guide wire was advanced.Following pre-dilation using a balloon catheter, a 2.75x16mm promus element ¿ drug eluting stent was advanced but failed to cross the lesion.The device was completely removed.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.However, returned device analysis revealed hypotube break and stent damage.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROMUS ELEMENT ¿
Type of Device
STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key6198983
MDR Text Key63211558
Report Number2134265-2016-11848
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
SIMILAR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/07/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/22/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/21/2016
Device Model NumberH7493911316270
Device Catalogue Number39113-1627
Device Lot Number18144694
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/14/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/07/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/13/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age62 YR
-
-