| Catalog Number |
1125350-12 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Cardiac Arrest (1762)
|
| Date of Event |
12/08/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.Visual and dimensional inspections were performed on the returned device.The stent damage and separation were confirmed.The failure to advance and difficulty removing the device could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.It was reported the device was re-inserted into the anatomy multiples times, which likely contributed to damaging the stent struts.It should be noted the xience alpine everolimus eluting coronary stent system instructions for use states: an unexpanded stent may be retracted into the guiding catheter one time only.An unexpanded stent should not be reintroduced into the artery once it has been pulled back into the guiding catheter.Subsequent movement in and out through the distal end of the guiding catheter should not be performed, as the stent may be damaged when retracting the undeployed stent back into the guiding catheter.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported failure to advance was likely due to interactions with the heavily calcified anatomy.Multiple re-insertions of the device likely caused damage to the stent, such that resistance was met with the guiding catheter during retraction.Force applied in the attempts to retract the device would have resulted in the damages and separation noted to the shaft.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effect of cardiac arrest, and the relationship to the device, if any, cannot be determined.The delay in procedure appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in the left main coronary artery with heavy calcification.Direct stenting was attempted using a 3.50 x 12 mm xience alpine drug eluting stent (des) but the des failed to cross the lesion.Pre-dilatation was then performed using a 3.5 x 12 mm balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) followed by the re-advancement of the xience alpine and the des failed to cross again.Dilatation was performed once more using the 3.5 x 12 mm bdc followed by the re-advancement of the xience alpine rx, but the des still could not cross the lesion.A 3.5 x 12 mm non-abbott des was attempted; however, it also did not cross the lesion.The 3.5 x 12 mm non-abbott des was re-advanced with the aid of a 5f guiding catheter for support; however, the non-abbott des became lodged within the 5f catheter.The non-abbott des was able to be retracted from the 5f catheter without damaging the guiding catheter.The same 3.5 x 12 mm xience alpine was advanced with the support of the 5f guiding catheter in an attempt to cross the lesion, but the alpine again failed to cross and was removed.Resistance was felt between the des and the guiding catheter during retraction causing the tip of the stent delivery system to separate within the guiding catheter.Additionally, it was stated that after the 3.5 x 12 mm xience alpine was removed from the patient, flared stents struts were observed.At this point in time, the patient started coding and chest compressions were performed on the patient.Once the patient's conditions stabilized, a 3.5 x 8 mm xience alpine was advanced and successfully implanted.No other information was provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|