|
|
| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Leak/Splash (1354)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
12/01/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Investigation - evaluation: a review of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), trends and quality control was conducted during the investigation.The device is shipped with an instruction for use (ifu) that describes the intended use, specific items are addressed such as: precautions, this product is intended for use by physicians trained and experienced in proper vascular access techniques.Standard techniques for the placement of vascular access sheaths, angiographic catheters and wire guides should be employed.All catheters and instruments used with this product should move freely through the valve and sheath.Separation of the sheath may result when the fit is tight.The complaint device was not returned therefore, no physical examinations could be performed; however, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.Review of device history record shows no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.Based on the information provided, no product returned and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.It is possible that a device used in conjunction with the sheath caused the silicone disk to dislodge; the device could have been too large or could have been inserted through the sheath off center or at an angle.Also, it is possible that the failure mode was related to manufacturing; the disk may not have been seated properly in the check-flo assembly.Without the benefit of a returned complaint device and with the information currently known, a definitive root cause cannot be determined.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported during a radial access procedure the valve was leaking.Another product was used to complete the procedure with no further issues reported.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the complaint history, drawings, device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), trends, quality control, and visual inspection / functional test of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.One used flexor radial access set was returned for investigation.The device came with the dilator inserted backwards in the sheath.No kinks or damage to the sheath or dilator were observed.The dilator was removed and a leak test was performed by occluding the sheath tubing with a hemostat at the proximal end.Water was injected through the connecting tube assembly using a syringe.Water profusely leaked out of the valve with little pressure applied.The dilator was inserted and the leak test was performed.No leaking was observed.The dilator was removed and the leak test was performed a third time and leaking was observed.A definitive root cause for this occurrence cannot be determined.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.Review of the device history record shows no nonconforming events that would contribute to this failure mode.There were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided and the results of our investigation; a definitive root cause could not be determined.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|