Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-JUG-TULIP |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
No Information (3190)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog#: unknown but referred to as a gunther tulip filter.Since catalog# is unknown the 510(k) could be either k090140 or k112119.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description according to short form complaint filed; it is alleged that "[pt] received a gunther tulip filter on (b)(6) 2012".Patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Outcomes attributed to device: device unable to be retrieved/difficult to remove (unsuccessful retrieval listed in ifu).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon completion.
|
|
Event Description
|
This additional information received on 2/14/2017 is as follows: implant date: (b)(6) 2012.Reason for implant: dvt and anticoagulation; gunther tulip cook; unknown lot number; placement physician: dr.(b)(6) hospital.Patient is alleging "device is unable to be retrieved; embedded".Failed retrieval attempt.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "device is unable to be retrieved; embedded" cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Difficult filter retrieval due to embedment of filter legs or filter hook in the ivc wall is a well-known risk reported in the published scientific literature.Several case reports published in articles, describe successful endovascular retrievals of such filters by advanced retrieval techniques.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|