CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. HAKIM PROGRAMMABLE VALVE W/PRECHAMBER; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 82-3110 |
Device Problem
Device Operational Issue (2914)
|
Patient Problem
No Information (3190)
|
Event Date 11/16/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation a follow up report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
We received a product complaint from venezuela, however, we have not the product information (name; code; lot).We only received the event below: ¿patient, after four (4) years of implanted valve, presumably there was a problem with the reservoir, which was a codman product.¿ per affiliate: the patient has a programable hakim valve implanted for 3 years.In a period of 4 months approximately began to have problems, the first time was reprogrammed and the second one removed.The patient with progressive impairment of cognitive functions and their hakim symptoms, gait and urinary incontinence.The doctor considered that the reservoir was not working and proceeded to removed the implant.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was initially reported that the device would be returned.It was later communicated that the device would not be made available for evaluation.This report has been updated to reflect the corrected information.Complaint sample was not returned to codman and no lot number information has been provided; therefore, an evaluation of the device could not be performed and manufacturing records could not be reviewed.The cause(s) of the difficulty reported by the customer could not be determined.If the complaint sample becomes available, this complaint will be reopened, and the respective evaluation performed.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was previously reported that the device would not be made available for evaluation.The valve was subsequently returned.Upon completion of the evaluation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was previously reported that the device would nto be made available for evaluation.The valve was subsequently returned.Upon completion of the evaluation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation it was noted that the images were taken of the ¿as received¿ valve.The position of the cam when valve was received was 70 mmh2o.The valve was hydrated.The valve was visually inspected; biological debris was noted.The valve was tested for programming with programmer 82-3126 with serial number (b)(4), the valve passed the test.The valve was flushed, the valve passed the test no occlusion was noted.The valve was leak tested, no leaks noted.The valve was reflux tested.The valve failed the test.The valve was dried.The valve was then pressure tested, the valve failed the test.The valve was dismantled and was examined under microscope at appropriate magnification: biological debris was found on the spring, on the spring pillar, on the ruby ball, on the seat of the ruby ball, and on the base plate.Review of the history device records for the valve product code 82-3110, with lot cpdbh0 conformed to the specifications when released to stock on the 16th may 2013.The root cause of the problem reported by the customer is due to the biological debris found on the spring, on the spring pillar, on the ruby ball, on the seat of the ruby ball, and on the base plate.Based on the results of this investigation no further action is required.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time this complaint is closed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|