Model Number ADVIA 2120I WITH DUAL ASPIRATE AUTOSAMPLER |
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 12/09/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A field service engineer (fse) was dispatched to the customer site.The fse verified the instrument and ran a few sample tubes to try and reproduce the problem.There were air bubbles in the sample line.The fse took apart the sampling module, cleaned it, put it back on the system and verified the needle alignment, 3 way valve and the sample line.The fse noticed that there was a rupture at the collar which may have been done during maintenance performed by the customer.The rupture at the collar was introducing air in the lines, which resulted in bad sample aspiration.The fse fixed the sample line, primed the assembly and ran a series of tests, which passed.The customer ran controls and validated the results based on their defined criteria.System was operational upon leaving the lab.The instrument is performing according to specifications.No further evaluation of this device is required.
|
|
Event Description
|
Discordant, complete blood count (cbc) results were generated on four patient samples on the advia 2120i with dual aspirate autosampler instrument.The discordant results were reported to the physician.The results of those four patient samples were not provided by the customer.The system did generate alarms for some of the patient samples.The same patient samples were repeated on a second advia 2120i with dual aspirate autosampler and those results were correct and reported to the physician.There were no reports of patient intervention or adverse health consequences due to the discordant cbc results.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Siemens healthcare diagnostics inc.Filed the initial mdr (2432235-2017-00021) on january 3, 2017.January 9, 2017 additional information: the customer has provided patient data for two of the four discordant patient results.Siemens investigation has determined that the customer did not follow operator guide instructions which state: through the use of complex flagging algorithms, laboratory personnel are alerted to suspected abnormal sample or system conditions.Sample/system flags display on the run screen and the review/edit tab.Whenever such flags are triggered, the user should review the results and take the action recommended.The customer released flagged results without following their laboratory's procedure on how to handle such results.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|