• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-JUG-CELECT-PERM
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); No Information (3190)
Event Date 09/06/2011
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Catalog number: unknown but referred to as a cook celect filter.Since catalog number is unknown the 510(k) could be either k061815 or k073374.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2008." patient outcome: it is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).Catalog#: igtcfs-65-jug-celect-perm.According to device history records, based on the lot number provided, there is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications or that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G., the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava in the situations described in the ifu.It has not been possible to fully investigate or evaluate this event based on the limited information provided to date.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is receiving warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.
 
Event Description
Description according to short form complaint filed: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2008".Patient outcome.It is alleged that [pt] was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.A supplemental report will be provided upon conclusion.
 
Event Description
This additional information was received on 12/29/2016 as follows: the plaintiff allegedly received device implant via right jugular vein on (b)(6) 2008 due to dvt and underlying hypercoagulable state.The plaintiff alleges vena cava perforation, organ perforation, and erosion of vertebral body after implant of device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Exemption number e2016032.William cook (b)(4) (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of cook medical incorporated (cmi) (importer).Manufacturer reference # (b)(4).It has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "vena cava perforation, organ perforation, erosion of vertebral body".Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae.E.G.Filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COOK CELECT JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA  4632
Manufacturer Contact
thomas hessner kirk
400 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8004574500
MDR Report Key6224395
MDR Text Key63912109
Report Number3002808486-2016-01615
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K073374
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/13/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-JUG-CELECT-PERM
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/28/2016
Device Age49 MO
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/27/2016
Initial Date FDA Received01/05/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
07/21/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/21/2017
04/28/2017
08/13/2017
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age51 YR
Patient Weight100
-
-