Corrected data: part number 114700, lot 954590 was reported as the suspect medical device on the initial medial device report it should be the concomitant part.The main suspect medical device is unknown.Manufacturer narrative: the reason for this revision surgery was the polyethylene bearing wore down.The actual length of in-vivo patient service for this product is unknown as the original surgery date was not provided or could be established.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.It was reported that part of the device was disposed of and part was left int the patient, it was not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history record (dhr) was not conducted since a lot number and part number was not provided or determined during the complaint evaluation.A search of the device investigation produced no anomalies or evidence of a product issue.The implant in-vivo service length is unknown without an original surgery date.Multiple searches of the djo surgical records and patient database revealed no additional information concerning this event.Zimmer-biomet was contacted for additional information through an invoice search and reported they have no additional information to report for this evaluation.This complaint will be closed with the main part number and lot number unknown pending receipt of additional information.Should additional information become available concerning this complaint, the complaint will be re-opened and a further review shall be conducted.This complaint is deemed to be non-product related.The complaint states the patient had not been adhering to the weight lifting restrictions, so polyethylene bearing wore down.No other conditions relating to this event could be determined with confidence.The surgeon reported no issues associated with the explanted product.
|