• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. ARROW CVC KIT: 16 GA X 20 CM; PERCUTANEOUS CATHER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. ARROW CVC KIT: 16 GA X 20 CM; PERCUTANEOUS CATHER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ASK-04301-KR
Device Problem Occlusion Within Device (1423)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/21/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn#(b)(4).The device product is not sold in the us.However, similar product is sold in the us.
 
Event Description
The customer alleges that the flushing test of the device was performed prior to insertion of the catheter and no problem was confirmed at that time.However, after placement of the catheter, a catheter blockage was confirmed.The catheter was removed and no further treatment was necessary.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The customer returned one single lumen cvc catheter.Visual examination of the returned catheter revealed signs of use but no damage or defects were observed.The catheter appeared used but typical.Microscopic examination revealed a nick in the extension line at the connection to the extension line hub.The nick and adhesive residue were observed in the same area indicating that this damage likely occurred upon removal of adhesive.Functional testing was performed by connecting a 10ml lab inventory syringe filled with water to the extension line hub.Pressure was applied to the syringe plunger and water was injected into the catheter and exited at the distal tip and at the extension line hub and tubing connection where the nick was observed.No resistance was encountered and no blocks were found.A 0.035 inch long pin gage was inserted into the extension line hub and passed through the body easily exiting at the distal tip.Again no resistance was met and no blocks were found.A device history record (dhr) review was performed on the ca theter and did not reveal any relevant findings.(con't) other remarks: the reported complaint of catheter blocked after insertion could not be confirmed through examination and functional testing of the returned sample.No resistance was met and no blocks were found during functional testing of the returned sample.A dhr review did not reveal any manufacturing related issues.No blockage related problem was found with the returned catheter.
 
Event Description
The customer alleges that the flushing test of the device was performed prior to insertion of the catheter and no problem was confirmed at that time.However, after placement of the catheter, a catheter blockage was confirmed.The catheter was removed and no further treatment was necessary.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARROW CVC KIT: 16 GA X 20 CM
Type of Device
PERCUTANEOUS CATHER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
reading PA
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL CR, A.S.
jamska 2359/47
zdar nad sazavou 591 0 1
EZ   591 01
Manufacturer Contact
katharine tarpley
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville, NC 27560
9194334854
MDR Report Key6230008
MDR Text Key64074253
Report Number3006425876-2017-00024
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/22/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date12/31/2017
Device Catalogue NumberASK-04301-KR
Device Lot Number71F16A0077
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/03/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/22/2016
Initial Date FDA Received01/06/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/13/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/04/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-