The external visual inspection revealed that the electrode was severed prior to receipt as well as damage to the epoxy header region and slices at the fantail region.All of these anomalies are believed to have occurred during revision surgery.The device passed the photographic imaging inspection.System lock was verified.The electrode condition prevented some of the electrical tests from being performed.The device passed the electrical tests performed.The device failed the residual gas analysis test.The internal visual inspection revealed cracked epoxy at the feedthru joints.The reported complaint of non-auditory sensation, pain, and discomfort could not be verified during this analysis, which was limited in some respects due to the electrode lead being severed prior to receipt.The device passed the electrical tests performed.However, the device had moisture content that exceeded the residual gas analysis test limit.Based on an assessment of the residual gas analysis and dye penetrant data, it is believed that this device was not hermetic.This is the final report.
|