| Model Number |
ZXT375 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Blurred Vision (2137); Visual Disturbances (2140); Halo (2227)
|
| Date of Event |
12/07/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol) was explanted in a secondary procedure.Replacement planned with a non toric symfony lens with the same power.Reportedly, the spherical equivalent post op, diagnostic refraction, is plano but the axis of the cylinder is almost 90 degrees off.All measurements and topography were repeated and remain the same as original.Cylinder will have to be readdressed post op.Further information reports they did not reposition the lens as there was truly no rotation.They just proceeded to lens explant.No incision enlargement, no vitrectomy, no sutures done, no patient post-op injury.The patient's records were provided and reports the following: patient's implant surgery on the right eye was (b)(6) 2016.Post op day one, (b)(6) 2016: slight blurry today with complaint of halos around lights.Visual acuity 20/25 +2 sc (sans corrected) visual acuity 20/25 slit lamp exam (sle) showed mild edema and trace cells.Post op, (b)(6) 2016: visual acuity 20/40; visual acuity 20/25.Lens explanted (b)(6) 2016 from the right eye post op (of lens explant) on (b)(6) 2016 complaint of film over right eye and halos visual acuity 20/20 -2 (sc) sans corrected visual acuity 20/70 (sans corrected) procedure performed anterior chamber paracentesis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected data: other relevant history: in the initial mdr, the following information was known however was inadvertently not included.The patient had pre existing corneal guttata and had an abnormal eye (patient has a long axial length and very flat keratometry values.Additional info: device available for evaluation ¿ yes, returned to manufacturer on 01/17/2017.Device returned to manufacturer ¿ yes.Device evaluation the device was returned to the manufacturer.Device inspection was performed and no anomalies were found.Manufacturing records were reviewed and the lens was manufactured according to specification.A search on complaints revealed no similar complaints were received for this production order number.The directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions for the proper use and handling of the intraocular lenses.Based on the investigation results there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to the manufacturer has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|