| Catalog Number |
808415100 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
12/22/2016
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This is our initial report on this incident.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported a mistyping with seraclone anti-n.The customer was not able to provide a date of event.She also did not provide any information, whether a false negative or a false positive result was obtained.The customer returned the supposedly defective product for investigational testing and a panel cell of a competitor, but did not yet provide the requested information.Our quality control laboratory is still waiting for the information about the complaint cause to start testing.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This is our final report on this incident.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported a mistyping with seraclone anti-n by using panocell #1 (the donor cell is identified as mn) from immucor (lot # 45028).Customer informed us that false negative results were obtained.The customer returned the supposedly defective product and also the competitor's product panocell #1 at the time the material arrived on our premises, the panocell was already expired.Our quality control laboratory tested the titer of the allegedly defective sample seraclone anti-n in parallel to their retained product sample and also against a reference lot.The minimum titer was reached and all other reagents showed comparable titer and reaction strength.Panocell #1 was tested with three monoclonal anti-n reagents and showed +/- reactions.Testing with polyclonal anti-n showed 3w positive results.The allegedly defective material, the retained sample and a reference lot was tested with positive reagent red blood cells (biotestcell, immucor).The reactions were clearly positive (4+).Testing by our quality control laboratory confirmed the correct functionality of the allegedly defective lot of seraclone anti-n.A review of the batch record documentation showed no irregularities which might have negatively affected the quality of the allegedly defective lot.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|