• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER; DQY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER; DQY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PXSLIMSTR
Medical Device Problem Code Mechanical Problem (1384)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 12/19/2016
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2017-00086, 3005168196-2017-00087.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat a ruptured anterior communicating artery (a-com) aneurysm using penumbra coils 400 (pc400¿s) and a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim).During the procedure, the physician placed a pc400 in the a-com using a px slim; however, the physician was not satisfy with the pc400 and therefore, it was replaced with a smaller pc400.The physician then attempted to advance two additional pc400s through the same px slim; however both pc400s would not advance through the px slim; therefore they were removed.It was reported that the physician was able to advance a micro-wire through the px slim prior to attempting to use advance one last pc400; however, the last pc400 would only advance few centimeters inside the px slim and became stuck.Therefore, the px slim was removed and the procedure was completed using another manufacturer¿s microcatheter and coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Results: there was no visible damage to the px slim.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned devices revealed both pc400s had compressed embolization coil damage.This type of damage can result from repeated attempts to forcefully advance or retract the embolization coil against resistance.The root cause of the initial resistance experienced by the physician when advancing the first coil could not be determined for the first coil evaluated.Further evaluation revealed the pc400 pusher assemblies were bent and kinked.This damage is likely incidental and may have occurred during return to penumbra facilities.The px slim had no visible damage and a 0.025¿ mandrel was advanced through the px slim without issue.Penumbra coils and catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2017-00086, 3005168196-2017-00087.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PX SLIM DELIVERY MICROCATHETER
Common Device Name
DQY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key6260667
Report Number3005168196-2017-00088
Device Sequence Number937249
Product Code DQY
UDI-Device Identifier00814548016436
UDI-Public00814548016436
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K120330
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,foreig
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Physician
Device Expiration Date02/28/2019
Device Catalogue NumberPXSLIMSTR
Device Lot NumberF68125
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/10/2017
Type of Report(Section G)FDA Requested
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/21/2016
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/18/2017
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/31/2017
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age64 YR
-
-