• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Overheating of Device (1437); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Burn(s) (1757); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Burning Sensation (2146); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Injury (2348)
Event Date 01/17/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Section d information references the main component of the system and other applicable components are: product id 97754 lot# serial# (b)(4) implanted: explanted: product type recharger.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The manufacturer representative (rep) reported burning at the battery site.Whenever the patient places their recharger over their battery directly on their skin, they had a burning sensation.It was reported that it was not hot temperature wise but burns.The patient was currently on work disability and they were trying to clear them to return to the workforce but with this issue, there was "no way" they could.When the rep used their programmer and as soon as the programmer was put over the battery site, the patient jumped with burning.It was the same type of telemetry head as the patient's programmer.After they put their programmer back on the battery site, the patient never complained of the burning again.Impedances were checked which were all within normal limits and they reprogrammed the patient, giving them four different programming options to choose from as well as activating their sensor.The patient was very happy with the result.The issue was not resolved at the time of the report.When the patient first had burning, there was a concern about a possible infection.The healthcare professional assessed the wounds which looked perfect where there were no redness, swelling, or tissue that was hot to touch.No surgical intervention occurred and no surgical intervention was planned.Relevant medical history includes complex regional pain syndrome type i and spinal pain.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative.It was reported that the patient was continuing to experience burning from the beginning of a charging session.The patient was now reporting decreased relief with stimulation as well, despite having good coverage.The manufacturer added hd options to address the issue and educated the patient about turning off adaptive stimulation (as) as the patient indicated positional changes were part of the issue.No further complications were reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Other applicable components are product id 97754 (b)(4) product type recharger product id 977c165 (b)(4) implanted: (b)(6) product type lead conclusion codeapplies to the ins and conclusion code applies to the lead.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative.It was reported that the patient¿s current program wasn¿t helping.The manufacturer representative stated that it was helping the patient, but now they were experiencing stimulation in the area of their ovary/bladder.Because of that, the patient believed that their lead had moved.It was reported that the patient was also expecting pain while going to the bathroom.The manufacturer representative stated that there was an hd group that helped when the patient was resting, but when they were up and active the pain would return.It was noted that a reprogramming session was scheduled.No further complications were reported or anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6264683
MDR Text Key65306584
Report Number3004209178-2017-01284
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109483
UDI-Public00643169109483
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/05/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/28/2017
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/17/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/19/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/26/2017
08/16/2017
08/16/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/12/2017
09/05/2017
09/06/2017
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age44 YR
-
-