|
The reason for this revision surgery was a patient elective surgery to replace the original poly insert.The in-vivo length of patient service for the implant was 10.7 years.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhrs) revealed no discrepancies or issues with the manufacturing of this part.All critical dimensions and specifications in effect at the time the part was manufactured were met.The product complaint report history was reviewed and no trends or on-going issues were deemed as present or in need of review.This event is deemed as non-product related.The root cause for this event was the patient selected, requested, the surgery.The patient had their right poly replaced due to wear.He was so pleased with those results that he wanted to replace this (left) one.Inventory containment is not required since there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|