• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400SMTHXSFT0420
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance (2578); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 12/22/2016
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet locks on the proximal end of the penumbra smart coil (smart coil) pusher assemblies were intact.The embolization coils were intact with their pusher assemblies.The embolization coils were slightly damaged and had offset coil winds.The embolization coil of the second smart coil evaluated was severely damaged near the distal end of the coil.The introducer sheath inner diameters (ids) were measured to be within specification.The embolization coil outer diameters (ods) were measured to be within specification.The smart coils were cycled through their respective introducer sheaths, and resistance was encountered.A demonstration introducer sheath was used, but resistance was again encountered.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned devices revealed that both smart coils met resistance during functional analysis.The introducer sheath ids and the embolization coil ods were measured to be within specification.Further evaluation revealed that both embolization coils were damaged and had offset coil winds.This damage may have occurred due to forceful advancement of the smart coils against resistance.The root cause of the initial resistance experienced when trying to advance the smart coils could not be determined.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2017-00093.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the middle cerebral artery (mca) using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, while attempting to advance two smart coils out of their introducer sheaths and into a non-penumbra microcatheter, the physician encountered resistance and subsequently, both coils became stuck inside their introducer sheaths.Therefore, the physician removed both of the smart coils and completed the procedure using a non-penumbra coil and the same non-penumbra microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key6265578
Report Number3005168196-2017-00092
Device Sequence Number1027251
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017334
UDI-Public00814548017334
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K160832
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 12/22/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Physician
Device Expiration Date11/06/2021
Device Catalogue Number400SMTHXSFT0420
Device Lot NumberF72655
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/28/2016
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/22/2016
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/19/2017
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age51 YR
-
-