A customer from the united states reported to biomérieux a misidentification of an api (american proficiency institute) survey sample of proteus vulgaris, as proteus penneri in association with the vitek® 2 gn id test kit.The repeated test result was proteus penneri.The customer stated they had a low discrimination and performed an indole test on the organism, which was negative indicating proteus penneri.The test reports were requested from the customer.An internal biomérieux investigation will be initiated.
|
Biomérieux conducted an internal investigation: the organism was tested on multiple lots of gn cards in duplicate.The api® 20 e was performed, as was the vitek® ms.On 2 of the customer lots, a low discrimination call of p.Penneri / p.Hauseri was obtained.On the remaining 2 customer lots tested and the random lot, a low discrimination call of p.Penneri / p.Pneumotropica was obtained.Api® 20 e gave a good identification call of p.Vulgaris group.Vitek® ms gave a low discrimination call of p.Penneri / p.Vulgaris.Since the organism is indole positive, the vitek® ms call of p.Vulgaris would be correct.A comparison of reaction results for cards giving the misidentification call of p.Penneri / p.Hauseri against the expected reaction results for p.Vulgaris revealed 3 atypical negative reactions (ple, ilatk, aglu).A comparison of reaction results for cards giving the misidentification call of p.Penneri/p.Pneumotropica against the expected reaction results for p.Vulgaris revealed 4 atypical negative reactions (proa, ple, ilatk, aglu).This is an atypical isolate.A complaint history review was completed for this issue during the last 13 month timeframe with no implication of a trend.No further action is warranted at this time.
|