• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES TUTTLINGEN 2.4/2.7MM VA-LCP BENDING PLIER; PLIERS, SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES TUTTLINGEN 2.4/2.7MM VA-LCP BENDING PLIER; PLIERS, SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03.211.005
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/08/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient id, age, dob & weight not provided for reporting.Implant and explant dates: device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Concomitant device reported: synthes 2.4mm/2.7mm variable angle locking compression plate (lcp), part # 02.211.252, unknown lot #, quantity x 1.Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.Device history records review was conducted.The report indicates that the: manufacturing location: part 03.211.005/ lot t957352, manufacturing date: 08-mar-2011.Review of the device history record of (b)(4) showed that there were no issues at the time of manufacturing of this device that would contribute to the issue outlined in this complaint.A review of inspection records and certifications, confirm that the components and final product met inspection records.All 32 parts of the lot were checked 100% for important features and for function at the final inspection on 08-mar-2011.No ncrs were generated during production.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2017 the patient underwent an open reduction internal fixation (orif) procedure of the left distal humerus to treat a fracture.During the case while the surgeon was trying to bend a synthes 2.4mm/2.7mm variable angle locking compression plate (lcp), the bending pliers broke at the most proximal plate holding post within the pliers.There was (1) fragment that was easily retrieved without intervention.These events resulted in a 15 minute no surgical delay.There was no alternate instrument.The surgeon used the malfunctioned pliers to complete the procedure.There was no harm to patient.The procedure was successfully completed and the patient was in stable condition at the end of the case.This complaint involves 1 device.Concomitant device reported: synthes 2.4mm/2.7mm variable angle locking compression plate (lcp), part # 02.211.252, unknown lot #, quantity x 1.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: product investigation was completed for part # 03.211.005, lot # t957352.A visual inspection, device history records review, and drawing review were performed as part of this investigation.A 2.4mm/2.7mm va lcp bending pliers was returned and reported to have broken during surgery.This complaint is confirmed; the proximal x-shaped post has sheared off at a diagonal slant.The balance of the returned device is in fairly worn condition with markings and signs of wear along its length.The 03.211.005 2.4mm/2.7mm va lcp bending pliers are an instrument routinely used in the 2.7mm variable angle locking calcaneal plating system.Relevant drawing was reviewed and determined to be suitable for the intended design, application and dimensional conformity when used as recommended.The condition of the returned device does agree with the complaint description.Whether the complaint condition for this device can be replicated is not applicable for this condition.It is likely that over five years of consistent use and possible rough handling during surgery or sterile processing has led to this complaint condition.The device was manufactured in 3/2011 and is over five years old.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
2.4/2.7MM VA-LCP BENDING PLIER
Type of Device
PLIERS, SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES TUTTLINGEN
unter hasslen 5
tuttlingen 78532
GM  78532
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES TUTTLINGEN
unter hasslen 5
tuttlingen 78532
GM   78532
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6281181
MDR Text Key65907064
Report Number9680938-2017-10010
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTC
UDI-Device Identifier10886982076038
UDI-Public(01)10886982076038(10)T957352
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number03.211.005
Device Lot NumberT957352
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/24/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/08/2017
Initial Date FDA Received01/26/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/27/2017
03/06/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/08/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age41 YR
-
-