| Catalog Number |
U44-645-18 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
01/10/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Patient weight is not available for reporting.Device is an instrument and is not implanted / explanted.Device is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has not been received yet.Device history records review was completed for part# u44-645-18, lot# u183106.Supplier: (b)(4), release to warehouse date: aug 19, 2013.Additional release to warehouse date sep 26, 2013 no non conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a twist drill (bit) broke into two pieces as it was used to drill a pilot hole during an anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion (acdf) on (b)(6) 2017.Both pieces of the broken bit were easily retrieved.Nothing was left behind in the patient.No reported surgical delay or additional x-rays were required.The procedure was completed successfully with the patient in stable condition.This report is for one (1) twist drill.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: a product development investigation was performed for the subject device.The instrument was evaluated at customer quality and the complaint condition was able to be confirmed.The returned instrument was missing approximately 6.68mm fragment of the distal cutting edge had sheared off.The fragments were not returned with the complaint.The received condition is indicative of having been subjected to force beyond the yield strength of the device.However, the root cause could not be definitively determined as the method of use and maintenance and the conditions at the time of the damage are unknown.A visual inspection and drawing review were performed as part of the investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.This complaint is confirmed.Measurements performed with calipers.Relevant product drawings were reviewed: u44_645_18.The design, materials and finishing processes were found to be appropriate for the intended use of these devices.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|