|
This mdr is being submitted past the 30 day reporting requirement as part of a retrospective review of the report that was initiated during an fda inspection.A retrospective review of the complaint record determined that this report should have been submitted as a malfunction report.In this case, no patient injury occurred; however, this may be likely to cause or contribute to a serious injury if it recurred.(b)(4).Investigation - evaluation: a review of the complaint history, specifications, trends, quality control and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.One flexor high-flex ansel guiding sheath and dilator was returned to assist in the investigation.The device was returned with the dilator inserted into the sheath.A separation in the sheath was noted approximately 16 cm from the sheath tip.The material is torn and fragmented at the separated section.The inner liner is also separated and the coils are showing, however the coils were not broken.No other damage was noted.Based on the information provided, examination of the returned device and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.
|