|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: visual inspections were performed on the returned device.The reported separation was confirmed.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported separation appears to be related to the operation context.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
It was reported that during unpackaging, when pulling a 3.5x23 absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (bvs) system from its dispenser hoop packaging without difficulty, the distal shaft separated at the proximal to distal junction area.The device was not used in the patient and there was no occurrence of a clinically significant delay.A new absorb was unpackaged without issue and was used to complete the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|