The exact date of the initial implant of the marker is unknown (although patient communication indicates 2012).Therefore, the event date has been left blank.Additionally, only the product family has been provide; a specific product code/model has not.Therefore, we are not able to conduct a full investigation and analysis of the device for its potential contribution to the reported event.Patient contacted manufacturer through manufacturer's website.Follow up with treating physician through sales rep indicated that the patient has history of mental illness that may have contributed to recent communication.Additional follow up with the treating physician revealed that the patient contacted them roughly 3 months ago and wanted the clip taken out because she said her body was reacting poorly to it.They advised her to follow up with her general practitioner at that time.Manufacturer communication has also redirected the patient to contact her physician to discuss additional treatment options.The treating physician have not heard from her since the original communication 3 months ago.This was also discussed with our (b)(4).Based on his feedback, it is unlikely that the metal clip is causing a reaction this long after implantation (marker implanted in 2012).At this time, the foreign body reaction is unconfirmed.However, under the abundance of caution, and pursuant to 21 cfr 803 because of the potential serious injury, we are submitting this medwatch report.Not returned to manufacturer.
|