|
Although the quantity of the defective screws is unknown, we are filing this report for notification purposes.The description for screws which were implanted in the patient are as follows: part #: 75446545; lot#: unknown; quantity: 2.(b)(4).Neither the device nor films of applicable imaging studies were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
It was reported that on: (b)(6) 2009: patient presented with following pre-op diagnoses: kyphosis acquired.Osteoporosis.History of craniopharyngioma.For which, patient underwent following procedures: posterior spinal fusion with segmental instrumentation t2 through t10.Image-guided surgery.Smith-petersen osteotomies, t6-7 and t7-8.T5 vertebral column resection.Insertion of structural intervertebral device.Application gardner-wells tongs.Patient is with a history of a t5 fracture and a marked progressive symptomatic kyphotic deformity.Per op notes, t5 disk space was identified.Initially, a 13 x 30 mm high mesh cage was selected and this had to be trimmed back about 8-9 mm.This was then filled with local bone and a rhbmp-2/acs.This was then seated into place at that t5 defect level.This was done from the right side.The local bone plus 60 ml of allograft bone along with the remaining 5 sponges from the large bmp kit were used to perform the posterior fusion.At t10, 6.5 x 45 mm screws were placed bilaterally patient tolerated the procedure well without any intraoperative complications.On (b)(6) 2009: patient presented with following pre-op diagnoses: kyphosis acquired and loss of fixation.Osteoporosis.Crani opharyngioma.For which, patient underwent following procedures: kyphoplasties l 1 and l2.Smith-peterson osteotomy, t11-t12.Posterior spinal fusion with segmental instrumentation t9 through t12.Indication of operation: patient had initial excellent correction, but then demonstrated falling of the screws at her distal instrumented level of t10 which on ct scan and intraoperatively appeared to be consistent with a chance-type fracture along with the loss of alignment.Because of this, the recommendation was made for revision of the instrumentation with extension of her fusion down to t12 along with vertebral body augmentation at the 2 levels distal to this.Per op notes, the set plugs were removed from the distal 3 instrumented segments.The rods were bent up and out of the way.The t10 screws were removed.The fracture site was investigated and found to be consistent with a chance fracture and we made the decision not to try to augment this vertebral body or to kyphoplasty it as there was disruption of the pedicle tracts bilaterally.A transfacial approach was performed to do kyphoplasties at l1 and l2.Allograft bone along with bmp was then used to perform a posterior and posterolateral fusion.Patient tolerated the procedure well without any intraoperative complications.
|