• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GÜNTHER TULIP VENA CAVA FILTER JUGULAR APPROACH; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GÜNTHER TULIP VENA CAVA FILTER JUGULAR APPROACH; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-JP-JUG-TULIP
Device Problems Kinked (1339); Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/20/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Catalog #: igtcfs-65-jp-jug-tulip.Similar to device under 510(k) k090140.(b)(4).Summary of investigational findings: the investigation of the returned parts relates to both (b)(4).The components are returned in one package with no individual marking.Therefore, it cannot be identified which components relates to (b)(4).Two jugular introducer, two filters and several dilators are returned.Sheath 1: there is two kinks.The kinks are located approximately 20 cm and 30 cm from the distal end.No penetration on the kink located 20 cm from the distal end.On the other kink there is a penetration on the backside of the kink.Sheath 2: there is six severe kink.The six severe kinks are located approximately on the same location as on sheath 1.There are nothing else to notice on the returned.It is most likely the strong resistance experienced that is the root cause for the kinks.Under normal conditions the sheath is strong enough to accomplish the procedure, but the introducer sheath may kink if excessive force is used to advance it through tortuous anatomy.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications.Cook medical will continue to monitor for similar events.
 
Event Description
Description of event according to initial reporter: approach was gained from jugular vein, and the puncture site was dilated with the dilator first.While advancement of the sheath system, the physician met strong resistance, however, the sheath would advance to the desired lesion.Then, the filter introducer was advanced through the sheath, but it would not advance.The sheath and the filter introducer were removed form the patient, and the physician noticed that the sheath got kinked.Since he pushed the filter introducer with force into the sheath, some part of the sheath had a hole.((b)(4), lot e3392103) another lot of the same device was used instead, however the same event occurred.((b)(4), lot e3380305) therefore, the access site was changed to fem and igtcfs-65-jp-fem-tulip was used, and complete the procedure successfully.Additional information received 26jan2016: the physician who performed procedure punctured external jugular vein by mistake.Therefore, this complaint occurred by physician's procedure.Patient outcome: there have been no adverse effects to the patient reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GÜNTHER TULIP VENA CAVA FILTER JUGULAR APPROACH
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
4632 bjaeverskov
DA 
Manufacturer Contact
marianne hoey
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA   4632
56868686
MDR Report Key6299543
MDR Text Key66433604
Report Number3002808486-2017-00275
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier00827002037731
UDI-Public(01)00827002037731(17)181027(10)E3380305
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,o
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/20/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/03/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-JP-JUG-TULIP
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/26/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/27/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-