• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300 Back to Search Results
Model Number 300-20
Medical Device Problem Codes Corroded (1131); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Fracture (1260); High impedance (1291); Mechanical Problem (1384)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Fibrosis (3167)
Date of Event 01/01/2016
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by the company representative that high impedance was detected during generator replacement surgery after a new model dual-pin generator was connected to the lead.The generator was replaced due to migration and no communication due to battery depletion as captured in mfr.Report # 1644487-2016-02759, when the generator migrated, the physician indicated that he believed the lead may have a strain relief issue due to the migration.Pin insertion troubleshooting was attempted but did not resolve the high impedance.The or specialist indicated that the didn't see a fracture but that he had that seen the wire near the electrodes bent at a 90 degree angle.He also reported that the lead was not implanted with proper strain relief.Additionally, there was a lot of scarring that made it difficult to remove the lead.The patient's lead was replaced.The suspect lead was received by the manufacturing facility for product analysis.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event or Problem Description
Product analysis was completed on the suspect lead.The lead was returned in multiple segments.The negative electrode and an unknown portion of the inner silicone tubing and quadfilar coil were not received.Setscrew marks on the lead pins indicated that at one point in time there was good mechanical and electrical connection between the generator and lead.An abraded opening in the outer tubing was found along with fluid inside the inner and outer tubing.For the observed inner tubing fluid remnants, there was no obvious path for fluid ingress other than the cut ends that were made during the explanted process.The report of a kinked coil was also verified.Three lead breaks were found.The first break identified was after the lead bifurcation at an abraded opening.Pitting on the coil surface was found.The second lead break was found in the area of lead near the electrodes after the lead bifurcation.One strand of the fractured lead was identified as fatigue-induced.Fine pitting was observed on one side of the fracture.The third lead break was found at the proximal end of the anchor tether.It was believed that stimulation to the patient with the lead break was present for a certain period of time due to the presence of metal pitting on this coil's surface.No other obvious anomalies were noted.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300
Common Device Name
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
MDR Report Key6302578
Report Number1644487-2017-03027
Device Sequence Number14488813
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
P970003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2002
Device Explanted Year2017
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/14/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date03/23/2004
Device Model Number300-20
Device Lot Number7910
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/31/2017
Event Location Other
Type of Report(Section G)FDA Requested
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/09/2017
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/03/2017
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/14/2017
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age37 YR
-
-