| Catalog Number |
33250360S |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
01/10/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device will not be returned.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.Device was discarded.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that in the revision due to a bolt break and nail fracture on (b)(6) 2016 an atrophe pseudoarthrosis was found.Locking screw was also found to be broken.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Evaluation revealed both the long nail kit and the (unknown) locking screw to be the primary products.No further associated product was reported.A physical examination could not be carried out since the reported products were scrapped by the customer according to information received from the sales rep.A review of the dhr for the reported nail kit revealed no discrepancies; the device was documented faultless prior to distribution.A review of the dhr for the reported locking screw could not be carried out as the product data are unknown.The case presents a revision after nail and screw breakage in a (b)(6)-year-old female patient with a sub-trochanteric fracture.In the surgical records of the revision surgery, a non-union of the sub-trochanteric femur fracture in terms of an atrophic pseudarthrosis was reported (according to the x-ray images received at the end of this report).The affected implants are designed to withstand the normal loads during the implantation period, i.E., the implant must neither be exposed to peak loads nor to continuous stresses.Another prerequisite for a successful supply is undisturbed, normal bone healing.In case that such a situation does not occur, exceeding of the fatigue strength is to be expected and thus quite predictable complications.Although an examination of the products was not possible it can be determined on the basis of the medical records provided, that the root cause of the reported event is not linked to a deficiency of the devices but is rather related to the patient¿s condition (non-union of the sub-trochanteric femur fracture in terms of an atrophic pseudarthrosis after an implant residence time of 5 months).Review of complaint history, capa databases and risk analysis did not identify any conspicuity.The review of the risk assessment for the failure mode indicated the issue was addressed adequately.There are no actions in place related to the reported event for the subject products.No non-conformity was identified.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that in the revision due to a bolt break and nail fracture on (b)(6) 2016 an atrophic pseudoarthrosis was found.Locking screw was also found to be broken.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|