• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. BARD FLAT MESH; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. BARD FLAT MESH; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0112720
Device Problems Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Urinary Tract Infection (2120); Hematuria (2558)
Event Date 03/26/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Currently, it is unknown whether the device may have caused or contributed to the reported event.The medical records provided show the patient experienced recurrent urinary tract infections, in regards to infection the warning section of the instructions-for-use states "if an infection develops, treat the infection aggressively.The prosthesis may not have to be removed.An unresolved infection, however, may require removal of the prosthesis.¿ a manufacturing review was performed and found no evidence of a manufacturing related cause for the alleged event.If additional event and/or evaluation information is obtained, a follow up mdr will be submitted.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.Not returned to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
The following is based on a review of medical records provided to davol by the patient's attorney: on (b)(6) 2004 - the patient was diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence (sui) and underwent a laparoscopic burch procedure with implant of a davol flat mesh.On (b)(6) 2013 - patient was diagnosed with bladder calcification, recurrent urinary tract infection, hematuria and bladder foreign body.The patient underwent a laser destruction of bladder calculus and removal of foreign body from bladder, i.E staples.Per the operative report the mesh was then seen and was acting as a nidus for this and in between the mesh there were 2 metallic staples.Utilizing the laser, the entire calcified stone was fragmented and then as much of the mesh as possible was fragmented, "kind of melted away from the staples." the staples were then hit right at the base so they became fragile and were grabbed with a grasper.There staples were then pulled out of the bladder wall.Once the staples were removed the laser was used to fulgurate and destroy the mesh further in the bed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BARD FLAT MESH
Type of Device
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC.
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
steven figueroa
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258460
MDR Report Key6322372
MDR Text Key67142101
Report Number1213643-2017-00091
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PREAMENDMENT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,other
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/10/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2008
Device Catalogue Number0112720
Device Lot Number43HND077
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/18/2017
Initial Date FDA Received02/10/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/27/2003
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age67 YR
-
-