Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information is not available for reporting.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Additional facility contact is prof.(b)(6).Reporting facility phone number is (b)(6).The subject device has been received and is currently undergoing investigation; the results are pending completion.A device history record review for the subject device lot has been requested.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Additional product code: hrx.Release to warehouse date: august 19, 2013.Supplier: (b)(4).No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product that would contribute to this complaint condition.A product investigation was completed: the overall complaint condition is confirmed as the reamer head was received with three of the four proximal prongs broken off and the ria drive shaft was received with the distal tip broken off.All broken off parts were returned for investigation.The review of the production histories revealed that both instruments were manufactured according to the specifications.The parts conformed to dimensional specifications at the time of manufacturing and passed inspection requirements with no non-conformities reported.Unfortunately the exact cause of failure cannot be determined; however the failure mode is consistent with a mechanical overloading.Although the exact cause cannot be determined, this complaint condition is likely a result of a mechanical overload; the complaint is determined not to be a result of a detected product related deficiency.No product related issues were found.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|