| Catalog Number |
338.345 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Bent (1059); Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information is not available for reporting.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device is expected to be returned to the synthes manufacturer for evaluation but has not yet been received.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.Manufacturer: synthes (b)(4).Date of manufacture date: nov 29, 2005.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that while inspecting field equipment, it was noted the tip of the coupling screw was bent.The synthes sales consultant attempted to straighten the tip, causing it to break off.There was no patient or procedural involvement.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A product investigation was completed: the returned coupling screw was confirmed to have a broken tip.The entire threaded portion of the tip is missing.The device has minor surface wear which does not impact functionality.A visual inspection, drawing review and device history record review were performed as part of this investigation.The complaint is confirmed.Replication of the complaint condition is not applicable as the device is already broken.The relevant drawings were reviewed during investigation.The design history was not found to impact the complaint condition.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.The returned parts were determined to be suitable for the intended use when employed.No definitive root cause was able to be determined.The tip likely became bent and weakened due to over 11 years of use and sterilization cycles.The tip eventually broke due to attempted straightening of the tip.There were no issues during the manufacture of this product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The design history was not found to impact the complaint condition.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.The returned parts were determined to be suitable for the intended use when employed.Reportedly there was no patient involvement.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|