| Catalog Number |
M003WS0400150 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Death (1802); Coma (2417)
|
| Date of Event |
01/24/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This is the 2nd of 5 reports.Subject remains implanted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient was presented in a life-threatening condition with a basilar thrombotic stroke and neurological deficit.Access to the clot was limited to the right vertebral artery (va) that presented a critical stenosis of the va-distal v4 segment.Left vertebral artery was occluded and not accessible.Angioplasty with a balloon catheter of the stenosis of va-v4 segment led to dissection resultant in hematoma and occlusion.Medical intervention in order to restore blood flow through the occluded va- v4 segment by angioplasty was performed without success.Then, stenting of the va-v4 segment with a first stent was performed.However, the distal stent tines did not open properly even with additional angioplasty procedure.Blood flow was not restored.A second stent was attempted to be implanted but could not be deployed beyond the poorly opened distal tines of the first deployed stent.A third stent (subject device) was deployed more distally in the basilar artery and overlapping the original stent.The stent was only placed with great difficulty through the first stent.There was some bending of the hypotube but it did not render the stent unusable.Blood flow was not restored and injection of platelet aggregation inhibitor into the occluded vessel as well as additional angioplasty was performed.The stent tines and the stents were eventually correctly opened but blood flow was not restored.Two days post procedure, the patient was determined to be in "coma" and pronounced dead shortly after.In the physician¿s opinion, ¿the outcome prognosis without the intervention was poor, with death as a possibility.The procedure did not help the patient and may have made him worse.The patient's death is not specifically related to any of the devices¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device history record (dhr) review confirms that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The subject device was not returned for analysis; therefore, physical as well as a functional testing could not be performed.As per the additional information, the physician¿s opinion is that the outcome prognosis without the intervention was poor, with death as a possibility.The procedure did not help the patient and may have made him worse.The patient's death is not specifically related to any of the devices.Therefore, the patient complications of coma and the outcome of death are known risks associated with endovascular procedures and noted as such in the device directions for use (dfu).Therefore, an assignable cause of anticipated procedural complication was assigned to the adverse event of complication/coma and the patient outcome of death.As per the additional information "the stent was only placed with great difficulty through the first stent.There was some bending of the hypotube but it did not render the stent unusable.The proximal aspect of the stent did not fully open upon deployment but did so after repeat balloon angioplasty".It is probable that the stent system was difficult to navigate through the initially deployed stent as this had not fully opened, causing the device to kink.It is probable that the stent was damaged as a result of the difficulties experienced advancing through the previously implanted stent, causing this stent not to fully open on deployment.Therefore, an assignable cause of operational context has been assigned to this investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient was presented in a life-threatening condition with a basilar thrombotic stroke and neurological deficit.Access to the clot was limited to the right vertebral artery (va) that presented a critical stenosis of the va-distal v4 segment.Left vertebral artery was occluded and not accessible.Angioplasty with a balloon catheter of the stenosis of va-v4 segment led to dissection resultant in hematoma and occlusion.Medical intervention in order to restore blood flow through the occluded va- v4 segment by angioplasty was performed without success.Then, stenting of the va-v4 segment with a first stent was performed.However, the distal stent tines did not open properly even with additional angioplasty procedure.Blood flow was not restored.A second stent was attempted to be implanted but could not be deployed beyond the poorly opened distal tines of the first deployed stent.A third stent (subject device) was deployed more distally in the basilar artery and overlapping the original stent.The stent was only placed with great difficulty through the first stent.There was some bending of the hypotube but it did not render the stent unusable.Blood flow was not restored and injection of platelet aggregation inhibitor into the occluded vessel as well as additional angioplasty was performed.The stent tines and the stents were eventually correctly opened but blood flow was not restored.Two days post procedure, the patient was determined to be in "coma" and pronounced dead shortly after.In the physician¿s opinion, ¿the outcome prognosis without the intervention was poor, with death as a possibility.The procedure did not help the patient and may have made him worse.The patient's death is not specifically related to any of the devices¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|