• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS ADVIA 2120I WITH DUAL ASPIRATE AUTOSAMPLER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS ADVIA 2120I WITH DUAL ASPIRATE AUTOSAMPLER Back to Search Results
Model Number ADVIA 2120I WITH DUAL ASPIRATE AUTOSAMPLER
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/20/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Siemens healthcare diagnostics inc.Is investigating the cause of the discordant high %reticulocyte result on the advia 2120i with dual aspirate autosampler instrument.
 
Event Description
A discordant high %reticulocyte result was obtained on an patient sample on an advia 2120i with dual aspirate autosampler (daa).The initial result was reported to the physician and questioned.The same sample was run on another advia 2120i with daa and a lower result was obtained.Corrected report was issued to the physician.There were no reports of patient intervention or adverse health consequences due to the discordant, high %reticulocyte result.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Siemens healthcare diagnostics inc.Filed the initial mdr 2432235-2017-00140 on february 23, 2017.March 17, 2017 additional information: siemens healthcare diagnostics' investigation has determined that the discordant result displayed a rtc-fs flag on the advia 2120i with dual aspirate autosampler (daa).This was due to a problem with the gaussian fit of the reticulocyte absorption histogram.The optipoint printout provided by the customer also showed the pulse width (modulator) was too high and should be 21.0 +/- 0.3.The other advia 2120i with dual aspirate autosampler (daa) did not report a flag and that result was accepted and a corrected report was issued to the physician.Siemens investigation determined that the cause of the discordant high %reticulocyte result was due to failure of the customer to follow the operator guide instructions.The operator's guide states for the operator to perform a reticulocyte count using a manual smear when an rtc-fs flag is generated.Whenever such flags are triggered, the user should review the results and take the action recommended.The customer released a flagged %reticulocyte result without following their laboratory's procedure on how to handle such results.The instrument is performing within specifications.No further evaluation of this device is required.Method code, result code and conclusion code were updated to reflect the results of the investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ADVIA 2120I WITH DUAL ASPIRATE AUTOSAMPLER
Type of Device
ADVIA 2120I WITH DUAL ASPIRATE AUTOSAMPLER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS
511 benedict avenue
tarrytown NY 10591
Manufacturer (Section G)
SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS MANUFACTURING LTD
chapel lane
registration# 8020888
swords, co. dublin,
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
loriann russo
511 benedict avenue
tarrytown, NY 10591
9145242287
MDR Report Key6352682
MDR Text Key68219777
Report Number2432235-2017-00140
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GKZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K102644
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/05/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/23/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberADVIA 2120I WITH DUAL ASPIRATE AUTOSAMPLER
Device Catalogue Number10404381
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/17/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured09/19/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-