A medtronic representative received a report that, while in a spinal fusion cervical procedure on (b)(6) 2017, the surgeon alleged an inaccuracy of 2.5 - 3.3 millimeters occurred during two imaging system spins.No further details regarding this issue, or specifically when it occurred, were provided.The surgeon opted to continue and completed the procedure with the use of the navigation system.There was no delay of therapy reported.There was no impact on patient outcome.In trouble-shooting at the site on (b)(6) 2017, the medtronic representative registered a demo head using tracer and when checking accuracy, was 2.5 - 3.3 millimeters off.An imaging system registration resulted in the same inaccuracy.In checking camera logs, there were no failures identified.It is deemed likely there was possible camera damage, as the site registered nurse (rn) noted that the camera had been bumped a few times.
|
Additional information: the surgeon was actively navigating when the inaccuracy was noted and an incision had already been made.There were two screws misplaced in the disc space.Active good navigation was never recovered and the surgeon opted to complete the procedure without the use of the navigation system.The screws were replaced without the use of the navigation system after approximately 15 minutes.No adverse effects occurred with the patient due to this issue and replacement of the screws.Additional information: a medtronic representative went to the site to test the imaging equipment used in the procedure.Completed 3d spins and transferred data to the navigation system, used contrast phantom to verify accuracy on both left and right sides.The imaging then passed the system checkout and was found to be fully functional.The medtronic representative reported that she was able to replicate the inaccuracy by doing a tracer registration, followed by a point merge registration in the cranial software.She used the passive probe & cranial frame and found it was inaccurate by 2-3mm.She did 2 different imaging system spins using her spine model and the results were the same.2-3mm off.She then replaced the camera and performed the same tests and was found to be accurate.The medtronic representative then returned to the site and used the original frame from the procedure and was also found to be accurate with the new camera/positioning sensor unit (psu).There have been no further inaccuracy issues reported since replacement.
|