|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.Visual and dimensional inspections were performed on the returned device.The separation was confirmed.The physical resistance could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported physical resistance and separation appear to be related to the anatomical condition.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|