• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO SYNCHROMED II; PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO SYNCHROMED II; PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 8637-40
Device Problem Volume Accuracy Problem (1675)
Patient Problems Fall (1848); Overdose (1988); Blurred Vision (2137); Dizziness (2194); Reaction (2414); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/01/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Information was received from a company representative regarding a patient currently receiving dilaudid and bupivacaine dose and co ncentration not reported via an implantable pump.The pump had previously been delivering fentanyl, bupivacaine and dilaudid dose and concentration not reported.The indications for use were non-malignant pain and degenerative disc disease.The patient reported a volume discrepancy.Per the patient the last 3 times they were refilled there was a suspicion there was more medication then expected at refill time.The patient was scheduled for a catheter dye study on (b)(6) 2017.The patient stated that they were refilled about every 6 weeks.The patient was wondering if a company representative could be paged to be at their next refill date (b)(6) 2017 and also the patient¿s upcoming catheter dye study.There were no patient symptoms reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received by a consumer on 27-mar-2017.It was reported that the volume discrepancies varied.There was no noticeable cause in the patient's volume changes other than a physical reaction.A dye study was done on (b)(6) 2017.There was no noticeable evidence of abnormal catheter function.It was noted that the patient had an apparent change in physiological reaction with no obvious mechanical cause.A new pain pump was implanted, which replaced the older unit.Replacing the unit was anticipated to resolve the issue.No further patient complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a healthcare provider (hcp) and a device manufacturer representative (rep).The patient was consistently having 6-8 ml of reservoir discrepancies at refills for the past year.No environmental, external, or patient factors were noted to have led or contributed to the issue.The pump was replaced on (b)(6) 2017.The issue was resolved and the patient was noted to be "alive-no injury".The patient was receiving 20 mg/ml dilaudid at 12.5 mg/day and 20 mg/ml bupivacaine at 12.5 mg/day.No further complications were reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis results were not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when analysis is completed.(b)(4).A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The pump was returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The pump was returned for analysis.The pump logs indicated that the pump had been used to deliver dilaudid (20 mg/ml at 12.538 mg/day) and bupivacaine (20 mg/ml at 12.538 mg/day).Pump analysis found gear train anomalies of a stall due to shaft bearing and corrosion, wear or lubrication.(b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a consumer indicated there was a high concern in the implant device¿s function.It was noted the previous reported discrepancies consisted of unreliable over doses resulting in dizziness, blurred vision, and numerous falls.There was no change in the malfunctioning device ¿i.E.Same physiological reactions, total unreliability.¿ it was noted the patient¿s volume discrepancies had been resolved.Steps taken to resolve the volume discrepancies were intrathecal implant pump replacement, post two month wait.No further complications were reported/anticipated or expected.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNCHROMED II
Type of Device
PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO
rd 31 km 24 hm 4
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO
rd 31 km 24 hm 4
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6365405
MDR Text Key68598776
Report Number3004209178-2017-04758
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LKK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P860004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/28/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/28/2013
Device Model Number8637-40
Device Catalogue Number8637-40
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/11/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/10/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/03/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
-
-