An event regarding a periprosthetic fracture involving an unknown accolade stem was reported.The event was confirmed following a review by a clinical consultant.Method & results: device evaluation and results: a visual, dimensional and functional inspection was not performed as the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records received and evaluation: a review by a clinical consultant noted: the type of fracture was apparently such that the fixation section of the stem was involved and consequently the stem had turned loose requiring revision.Frequently fracture stabilisation is required with dall-miles cables/plate types of systems about which there is also no info for this patient.The cup was left in place.Its mechanical stability was apparently adequate although no further surgical details were provided about the revision procedure other than that the stem was revised with a new femoral head implanted.A traumatic fall of a patient is not a normal condition but a patient-related adverse event causing acute overload in the bone surrounding the device and this represents the root cause of failure by pp-fracture in this pi case.Conclusions: a review by a clinical consultant concluded:a traumatic fall of the patient at 1½-years post arthroplasty caused a periprosthetic fracture requiring revision with stem exchange.Further information such as device details, return of device, revision surgery operative reports, x-rays, patient history & follow-up notes are needed to investigate this event further.If additional information and/or device become available, this investigation will be reopened.
|