Multiple devices were involved in the event.Since we cannot determine which of the devices led to the event, we are filing this report for notification purposes.Following devices are suspected to have contributed to the event: lot # 5432141, (b)(4), 5432147, (b)(4).Neither the device nor films of applicable imaging studies were returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the reported event.These parts are not approved for use in the united states; however, a like device catalog # 5442141, 510k # k091974 and upn# (b)(4) was cleared in the united states.
|
Pre-op diagnosis: burst fracture at thoraco-lumbar junction part (fixation: 2a2b) procedure: posterior spinal fusion levels implanted: t10-l2 it was reported that on an unknown date, post-op, the part of the skin where the crosslink had been placed was damaged.The damaged site was at the stage prior to pressure ulcer.There was also pain due to protrusion of the device.Patient underwent a revision surgery for removal of all the implants.
|