| Model Number |
ZXT300 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Visual Disturbances (2140); No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
02/10/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If explanted, give date: not applicable as lens remains implanted.(b)(4).All pertinent information available to the manufacturer has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a female patient could not tolerate the starbursts after a model zxt300 18.5 diopter intraocular lens (iol) was implanted.They tried neuroadaptation and distance spectacles.Additionally, the physician noted that the lens was anatomically perfect, but the patient was just very unhappy, and was unable to drive safely at night.There was no patient anatomy issue or a product quality issue.Patient was complaining and wanted a monofocal toric lens to reduce her unwanted images at night.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information was received and indicated that the eye affected was the right eye (od).The prior lens was bisected/discarded and a replacement lens model zct150 (18.5 diopter) lens was used.There is no defect in the lens, just rings that caused intolerable starbursts and halos.The patient reported starbursts issue on (b)(6) 2017.It was confirmed that no incision enlargement was required and no vitrectomy was performed.In addition implant and explant dates were provided and also the date when patient symptoms started.Corrected data: as a result of the additional information received the following fields have been updated from what was reported in the initial mdr: in the initial report only serious injury was indicated however with the provided explant date this field has been updated to include required intervention in the initial report the ''date of event'' of (b)(6) 2016 was listed which is also the implant date of the lens.Additional information indicated that the date of event, when patient's symptoms started was (b)(6) 2017.Date of event: (b)(6) 2017.If implanted; give date: (b)(6) 2016.If explanted; give date: (b)(6) 2017.(b)(4).All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation: the product testing could not be performed because the product was not returned for evaluation.Device inspection could not be performed, therefore the reported complaint could not be confirmed.Manufacturing record review: manufacturing records were reviewed and the device was manufactured according to specification.A search on complaints revealed no similar complaints were received for this production order number to date.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions for the proper use and handling of the product.Conclusion: based on the investigation results there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to the manufacturer has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|