Model Number H7493926020400 |
Device Problems
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 02/17/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device is a combination product.(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr.:the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental med watch will be filed.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that stent dislodgment occurred.During a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure, it was noted that the left main artery was at risk for occlusion; therefore, a 4.00 x 20 synergy ii drug-eluting stent was positioned in the left main artery as a protective measure.After the tavr valve was deployed, it was determined that the stent was no longer needed and removal of the synergy ii stent was attempted.However, during removal, the stent was stripped off and remained in the aortic root and left main artery.Subsequently, the dislodged stent was retrieved with a snare back into the non-bsc guide catheter.No patient complications were reported and the patient's condition was stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Describe event or problem updated.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that stent migration and explant occurred instead of stent dislodgment as previously reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: the stent delivery system (sds) was not returned for analysis therefore the catheter batch/serial number cannot be identified.A visual examination of the crimped stent found that the stent had detached from the sds and was severely damaged the whole length with stent struts stretched and distorted.The sds was not returned for analysis therefore reviews for individual assessment of the catheter could not be performed.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical/procedural factors.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that stent migration and explant occurred instead of stent dislodgment as previously reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|