| Catalog Number |
314.132 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Bent (1059)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: there was no reported patient involvement associated with the complained event.Event date: unknown.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device has been received and is currently undergoing investigation.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.Manufacturer: synthes (b)(4).Date of manufacture: may 3, 2012.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during routine inspection of inventory, a 3.0mm hexagonal screwdriver with t-handle instrument was discovered to be bent.There was no reported patient or procedural involvement associated with the reported event.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A product investigation was completed: the returned device was confirmed to have a bent distal tip.The device has normal wear associated with use.The diameter of the tip was measured and found to be within specification.The device has normal wear associated with use.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record (dhr) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.A visual inspection, drawing review and dhr review were performed as part of this investigation.The complaint was confirmed.Replication of the complaint condition is not applicable as the device is already bent.No additional malfunctions were observed during investigation.The relevant drawings were reviewed during investigation.The design history was not found to impact the complaint condition.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.The returned parts were determined to be suitable for the intended use when employed.No definitive root cause was able to be determined.The device likely became bent due to off axis forces during use.There were no issues during the manufacture of this product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The design history was not found to impact the complaint condition.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.The returned parts were determined to be suitable for the intended use when employed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|