|
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the ruby coil pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 5.0 cm from the proximal end.The stretch resistant wire (sr wire) was fractured and the proximal constraint sphere was inside the distal detachment tip (ddt).Conclusions: evaluation of the returned devices revealed that the lantern was ovalized.This type of damage likely occurred due to forceful handling during use.Further evaluation of the returned devices revealed that the ruby coil¿s stretch resistant (sr) wire was fractured.This type of damage likely occurred due to forceful retraction against resistance.The kink in the pusher assembly was likely incidental and likely occurred while packaging the device for return.The other lantern and ruby coil mentioned in the complaint were not returned for evaluation.Penumbra catheters and coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2017-00356, 3005168196-2017-00357, 3005168196-2017-00358.
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the hypogastric artery using ruby coils and lantern delivery microcatheters (lantern).It was noted that the patient had an abnormal hypogastric artery and it was difficult to gain access via the contralateral approach due to an acute turn at the arch of the iliacs.During the procedure, while retracting a ruby coil (lot #f72627) back into a lantern (lot #f70657) for repositioning, the physician experienced resistance and the ruby coil unintentionally detached from the pusher assembly inside the lantern around the acute angle area.Therefore, the lantern was removed with the detached coil inside.The physician then attempted to access from the contralateral side using a new lantern (lot #f72064).While a new ruby coil (lot #f60720) was being prepared on the back table for use, the ruby coil pusher assembly was bent and had unintentionally detached from its pusher assembly.Without knowing that, the physician advanced the ruby coil through the new lantern and into the patient but decided to retract the coil for repositioning.While attempting to retract the ruby coil, the physician noticed that the ruby coil had unintentionally detached from its pusher assembly.Therefore, the lantern was removed with the detached ruby coil.The procedure was then completed using an additional coil, which did not require a microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|